“Psych one, psych two. What do you know? All your life is channel 13…”

I saw and read and watched on TV a lot of things as a kid that certainly my parents wouldn’t have wanted me to see.  On the down-low, of course.  Nowadays though, the ‘rents would be considered downright negligent.  Still, I relate to this, from Michael Sarko on Popdose…

I admit I’m nostalgic for the days of TV’s unbidden bizarreness, but I know each generation has its own thing. Indie theaters, cavernous book stores, random pamphlets, underground newspapers– They’re all sources of weird throughout the history of pop culture. One way or another, a kid needs to have that strange fruit to fuel creativity and open-mindedness.

Some of the weirdness to which I was exposed between the ages of 8 and 16: The Exorcist (the film and William Peter Blatty’s novel), The Young Ones, and thanks to unsupervised late-night cable-access TV-watching, my first therapist in The Asylum for Shut-Ins: Video Psychotherapy.

He tells it like it is…

But, he’s really not that stuffy. He’s kinda easy-going, really…

He’s really helped my creativity and open-mindedness. I’ve turned out all right, I think.

Right?

“I’ve been one poor correspondent…” (Again)

I was tempted to call this post “Don’t Call it a Comeback” and put up the video for the classic “Mama Said Knock You Out.”  But that’s not my style.  I do feel like I’m sort of coming home again.  That is to say, back to something closer to my normal self.

And besides that, you all know The Menahan Street Band is more my style anyway.  And, this is a bit of a homecoming, after all.

So, this is the portion of the entry where I make vague, cryptic statements about what’s kept me away for so long.  How I’ve been, what’s been going on, what unspeakable Lovecraftian horrors I’ve stared into which drove me temporarily insane, &c. In time, in time.  Maybe. 

Actually… probably not.  Not here, anyway. 

But the important part is, I’ve finally, after a few months, regained the ability to “fake it ’til I make it.” Until then, I’ll occasionally open up the peep hole, mutter a few things occasionally (lots going on to talk about soon!), and then close it.  Thus, comments are closed for now.

Oh, and I took the dynamic view off and put the old template back up, at least until I find something better.

@Inkpunks

From a cool t-shirt.

Galen, from the Inkpunks crew, invited me to do a guest post for them.  I did a little Sally Fields “You like me! You really like me!!” dance in my head.  Little did she know how hard I was banging said head into my desk trying to come up with a worthy post, before she mentioned, “Oh yeah, a bunch of folks are doing posts about workshops.”  The big ones.  The ones all of us genre writers want to go to–Clarion, Odyssey, Viable Paradise, Uncle Orson’s, &c. The ones that a lot of us can’t take six weeks away from life to attend.

At least, not directly…

Check out “Autodidactic Asphyxiation” at the Inkpunks blog.

“But here you are in the ninth, two men out and three men on…”

Photo from here, via here.

The rumors of my death have only been a teeny bit exaggerated.  My face has cycled through each of the faces of the eggs up there about five or six times.  Even the one in the pan.  If the past few weeks of my life had a theme song, it’s been Billy Joel’s “Pressure.”


It’ll probably be the theme song of the next few weeks.  But it’s okay.

Different kinds of therapy have helped me cope: talk therapy, alprazolam, not to mention retail therapy, thanks to sales at Weightless Books and Golden Gryphon Press.  Seriously, I got 50% off of two TPBs I should’ve had in my library years ago…

Add to that the latest collections from Geoff Ryman, Maureen McHugh, and Joan Aiken–not to mention the list I’m currently working through–and I should be set until the summer…

…except for some other reading, which I’ll be talking about tomorrow.

What, Me Worry?

So, I found that one of my blog posts may have played a tiny part in a small kerfuffle.  It might’ve had to do with my statement that…

I need to read more fiction by men. There, I said it.

I know how it sounds, what with all the stuff going on at DC Comics these days, to say nothing about the general He-Man-Woman-Hater’s club vibe that some parts of genre-dom still have (even in writing circles).  Hell, anyone who doesn’t know me and sees The Playboy Book of Science Fiction and Fantasy in my goodreads “currently reading” list might well roll their eyes and write me off as a toolbag….

Now, I suppose it does beg the question, “Okay, Don, where does your fear of that reaction come from?”

It comes from the same portion of my monkey brain that makes me think twice about walking through a dark alley in Any City, USA without having first geared myself up like a Sayoc Kali practitioner.  Because unless I can know exactly what does or doesn’t lurk in that alley, my monkey brain only sees the dark and, therefore, can see exactly two choices: fight or flight.  Avoid the alley or walk in with my guard up.

Why?  Because, the world being what it is, maybe I walk through that alley and end up feeling a little stupid because my fears were unfounded, as there was no one in the alley to begin with.  Or, maybe I’ll find that I was glad that I was on-guard and ready to feed an attacker his own eyeballs

In my post, I talked about how I’m currently reading specific male writers for specific reasons. One minor point, though: It was not because I don’t have as many male writers as female ones on my bookshelves.  It’s because I’ve been wondering if I could be missing out not having as many significant male writing influences as female ones in my head.  (And I admit, it’s a theory that could be off-base.)

With the world being what it is, I was afraid (and I could’ve been off-base here, too) that to simply say, “Yeah, I’mo read stories exclusively by men, for a bit, because…” and to have left it there would, at best, make me look like I was willingly ignoring the gender elephant in the room.  Or, at worst, make me look really, really stupid.  And you know, maybe I still do, the world being what it is…?

Logical?  Well, about as logical as the fear of the dark alley, which is to say that maybe it is and maybe it isn’t.  Might depend on the alley, or on who may or may not be in it, the time of evening, whatever.  But there’s only ever one way to find out.  And thus, it felt right for me to do the rhetorical equivalent of nonchalantly placing my hand on the tactical folder I’ve secreted on my hip for a quick draw, just in case.  To me, it’s just acknowledging the possibility that maybe, just maybe, some shit could go down.

I’d thought the biggest issue with my post was having accidentally left Jeffrey Ford’s name off the Male-Writers-Who’ve-Influenced-Me list.  But just because the particular scenario I feared didn’t play out (yet), was my defensive “There I said it” posture unwarranted?  Should I have braved that alley as if it were broad daylight, confident that there was nothing in it that could possibly hurt me?

I dunno, you decide.

Incomplete Review

The Robert Sheckley Omnibus (Penguin Science Fiction)  The Robert Sheckley Omnibus by Robert Sheckley
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

I skipped the longer works in the Omnibus, the novel Immortality Inc and the story “A Ticket to Tranai,” and focused on the shorter pieces.  I’ll come back to them eventually.  Here are some brief thoughts on everything else…


“Specialist” works as a wonderful, if a tad simplistic, metaphor.  4*

I liked the worldbuilding (i.e. Sheckley’s commentary on his–and even MY–world) in “Bad Medicine” a bit better than I liked the overall plot.  4*

The prose style of “Pilgrimage to Earth” might show its age a bit, but the story’s concepts and the way Sheckley pulls them off are pure 21st century, IMO.  5*

5* for “Ask a Foolish Question” because Sheckley’s The Answerer predates–and outthinks–Deep Thought.

“The Battle” is an even better scifi/fantasy mashup than that Joan Aiken story I read the other week. 5*

“Hands Off” gets points for cleverness, but the old-school prose style just turned me off.  4*

“The Prize of Peril.”  Same prose issues as “Pilgrimage to Earth,” but it gets 5* for talking about the issues we talk about concerning reality TV today.  Except Sheckley did it, oh fifty-freaking-years ago!

“Hunting Problem” was a little too predictable, mostly because I’d already read “Hands Off.” 3*

Odd, that I remembered reading “Ghost V” in Sheckley’s The People Trap, yet I don’t recall the ending touching me quite as much as it did this time around.  5*

“Something for Nothing” is another 50+ year-old too-close-to-home prediction of 2011.  5*

There’s a tiny part of me that’s pissed off that I didn’t see the ending of “The Store of the Worlds” coming a mile away.  But then I re-read it.  Nope, almost no way I could’ve seen it.  I’ve been misdirected by plot before; never by theme.  5*

View all my reviews

“Who ever told you that you could work with men?”

I need to read more fiction by men.  There, I said it.

I know how it sounds, what with all the stuff going on at DC Comics these days, to say nothing about the general He-Man-Woman-Hater’s club vibe that some parts of genre-dom still have (even in writing circles).  Hell, anyone who doesn’t know me and sees The Playboy Book of Science Fiction and Fantasy in my goodreads “currently reading” list might well roll their eyes and write me off as a toolbag.  But I have a good reason.

Everyone who does know me as a writer, or has read this blog, knows of my love of M. Rickert, Aimee Bender, Carol Emshwiller, Karen Joy Fowler (her short work, at least), and Kelly Link.  I’ve recently acquired and devoured collections by Joan Aiken and Margaret St. Clair.  My favorite issue of Tin House thus far is 33: Fantastic Women.  The only novel I’ve really, truly enjoyed in the past few years was Sarah Shun-lien Bynum’s Madeline is Sleeping.  I wish I could write like Lydia Davis, Ann Beattie, and Amy Hempel.  I also wish I had Fran Lebowitz’s brain.  These writers have really sort of set the bar as far as what I look for in a story.

Sure, there are male writers who do that for me, too.  Etgar Keret, Ray Vukcevich, Howard Waldrop, Peter S. Beagle, Harlan Ellison, Raymond Carver, Barry Hannah, and… um… and… and…

See, therein lies the problem.

I might sound a bit disingenuous if you take a look at my goodreads “Favorite Authors” list.  You’ll find Jonathan Lethem, Benjamin Rosenbaum, and other dudes and they certainly belong there.  But in terms of having the influence that the aforementioned female writers have (or wish they would have), it’s just not there.

And, it’s not like I don’t have the books, either.   Which is why I’m taking steps to rectify the situation.  They say, “Plan the work.  Work the plan.”  And, that’s what I’m doing by moving 8 particular books to the top of my reading queue…

For the curious, The Playboy Book of Science Fiction and Fantasy is lower on the queue.  But it’s worth mentioning that I got the book because it has a bunch of writers with whose work I need to be better acquainted (Robert Sheckley, William Tenn, Charles Beaumont, et al.).

The Green Flash

The Green Flash and Other Tales of Horror, Suspense, and FantasyThe Green Flash and Other Tales of Horror, Suspense, and Fantasy by Joan Aiken
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

I couldn’t believe my luck when I found this collection at a local used book store! It didn’t finish quite as strongly as it started, but there are pieces that were clinics on short-story writing. Here’s how I thought of each story…


“Mrs. Considine.” I don’t describe too many stories as “chilling,” but this story of a girl with a gift bonding with an older woman with another gift is just that. 5*

“Marmalade Wine.” The reason I snatched this collection from a used book store was this story, which was adapted as a segment for Rod Serling’s Night Gallery. A decent straightfoward story about comeuppance. 4*

“Sonata for Harp and Bicycle.” The expository middle didn’t stop this from being a story of the most romantic exorcism I’ve ever read. 5*

“Follow My Fancy.” This is not a “science-fantasy” story. It’s both a scifi story and a fantasy story, rolled into one. 5*

“Smell.” Saw the ending coming a mile away. Hate when that happens. 3*

“Searching for Summer.” If you let yourself get too caught up thinking “What REALLY happened here?” you’ll miss the beauty of this story. 4*

“A View of the Heath.” 5* ‘cos who said a mystery story has to have anything to do with a dead body?

“Belle of the Ball.” If I’ve ever read a story that was very proto-Aimee Bender and the like (Sarah shun-lien Bynum, etc), this is it. 4*

“Summer by the Sea.” This calls to my mind Karen Joy Fowler’s Nebula Award-winning “What I Didn’t See.” You could argue that any sf/f/h genre element is non-existent, depending on how you read it. I will say that reading it one way makes this a better story. 5*

“Minette.” Not quite as chilling as “Mrs. Considine,” but it is another wonderful example of what happens when two supernatural forces meet. 5*

“Dead Language Master.” Very engaging at the sentence level. But to the other mechanics of the piece, my reaction was, “Just…no.” 3*

“The Windshield Weepers.” Some aspects of this story really seemed ahead of its time. The ending really didn’t do it forme though. 3*

“The Green Flash.” It pulled me along quite nicely at sentence level. Unfortunately it became obvious that this was 2 or 3 stories thrown together as soon as I gave the plot a second’s thought. 3*

View all my reviews

Confession (or, Sorry, M.)

I picked up the latest issue of The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction because it had M. Rickert’s new story “The Corpse Painter’s Masterpiece.”  I’ll buy anything with M. Rickert’s name on it.  I wish F&SF had a “Just the Issues with M. Rickert in It” subscription option.  I have every issue with her stories since 2006 (except for one I’ve misplaced somehow).  I have both her collections, Map of Dreams and Holiday, and copies of her stories in Ideomancer and Interfictions 2.  I’ve spoken about my love of her writing here, and other places.  Yes, on my list of Favorite Writers, she is #1.  The very top.

I say all this so that you can have of sense of just how much it really and truly pains me to say: I wasn’t that into “The Corpse Painter’s Masterpiece.”

Most of you know the standard I have for my short-story reading experience: That Aimee Bender quote I use all the time, “I want to be violated by insight.”  The thing is, unless I’m seriously romanticizing my relationship with Rickert’s writing, I can’t think of a single one of her stories that didn’t give me that feeling… before this one.

Make no mistake: in my usual 5* rating system, this one would get a 4, but only because I typically round off.  If I had to be accurate (as much as one can be with a subjective rating), I’d give this a 3.8.  It had every bit of the dark beauty I’ve come to love in Rickert’s stories.  The imagery at the end blew me away.  But I think my damage has to do with Rickert’s use of the third-person omniscient viewpoint. 

I’m grateful that she tries to shy away from old-school “one POV, section break, next POV” and attempt something a little different.  At the sentence level, Rickert really does a skillful job weaving in and out of each character’s thoughts.  But as a whole, it muddied the waters in two different ways for me.  It messed with my sense of time, for one.  And for another, I never knew for which characters to really concern myself by the end of it.

Not counting the corpses (C’mon, that’s not a spoiler.  Look at the title.  You knew there were going to be corpses in it.), the story had a cast of three: The Corpse Painter, the town sheriff, and the sheriff’s wife, and I was in one of their heads at various points of the story.  And while most of the story seemed to be about the relationship between the sheriff and the Corpse Painter, the real punch of the story came in the last scene between the sheriff and his wife.  The more I think about it, I’m wondering if Rickert putting me into the wife’s head was her way of attempting to connect a reader with the wife as an expedient way to set up the payoff at the end, while still maintaining most of the story’s focus on The Corpse Painter and the sheriff?

Who knows?  I’m clearly rambling at this point.  I’m just having trouble pinning down my exact feelings about this story.  To say “disappointed” or “let down” seems far too harsh.  Maybe this is a case where I just need to appreciate the attempt to do something different and be okay with the fact that maybe the clearest way to sum up my feelings is, “I just didn’t dig it.”  After all, Rickert is still my #1 favorite writer, I’ll still buy anything with her name on it, and if there was an “M. Rickert Only” F&SF subscription option, I’d snatch it up in a heartbeat.